Legal Opinion
Warner v. BROCHENDORFF
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 5, 2012No. AC 31453PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALVORD, J.
The plaintiff, Scott Warner, brought the present action to foreclose a judgment lien on certain property in Salisbury owned by the defendant, Dianna Brochendorff. The trial court, after reducing the amount of the underlying judgment, rendered a judgment of foreclosure by sale (foreclosure judgment) in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff appeals from the foreclosure judgment, claiming that the court improperly permitted a collateral attack on the underlying judgment. The defendant cross appeals from the foreclosure judgment, claiming that the court improperly determined the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Meinket v. LevinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Journal Publishing Co. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Batory v. BajorConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Whitaker v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stuart v. FreibergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Lynn v. BoscoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Bank of New York Mellon v. TopeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- Bree v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Bank of New York Mellon v. TopeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.