Har v. Boreiko

Opinion

LAVINE, J.

This quiet title action concerns a boundary common to three parcels of land in Milford. The pro se plaintiff, Wanda I. Har, 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the defendants, Dorothy S. Boreiko and Karen A. Fitzmaurice. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court’s findings with respect to her quiet title and adverse possession claims are clearly erroneous. 2 We disagree and, thus, affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The crux of the parties’ dispute concerns the location of the eastern boundary of the…