Legal Opinion

Olson v. Havir Manufacturing Co. of St. Paul

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 6, 1984No. C0-84-640PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

This is an appeal taken from an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. A jury found that Truex was negligent, but that its negligence did not cause Olson’s injuries. We affirm.

FACTS

Richard Olson injured his right hand on October 9, 1979, while operating a Havis punch press which had been sold by Truex to Olson’s employer, L & L Manufacturing, three years prior to the accident. The machine was sold with the caveat that its activating switch, an unguarded foot pedal, should be replaced by a safer double palm switch. L & L did not make this change.

T…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Lesmeister v. DillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Flom v. FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Bergemann v. Mutual Service Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Nihart v. KrugerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rud v. FloodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Bresson v. StoskophCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Gale v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Lipa v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Rud v. FloodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API