Legal Opinion
Rud v. Flood
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 15, 1986No. C8-85-1724Published
1Opinion of the Court
385 N.W.2d 357 (1986)
Olga RUD, Appellant,
v.
Raymond FLOOD, Respondent.
No. C8-85-1724.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
April 15, 1986.
Paul A. Strandness, Logan N. Foreman, III, Eckman, Strandness & Egan, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.
Patrick S. Scallen, Salmen & Von Feldt, St. Paul, for respondent.
Heard, considered and decided by NIERENGARTEN, P.J., and FORSBERG and LESLIE, JJ.
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Olga Rud commenced this action against Raymond Flood to recover damages for injuries sustained as a result of an automobile collision. Flood admitted fault and the sole issue for the jury was the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Sell v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. v. FitzimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.