Legal Opinion

Bresson v. Stoskoph

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 1985No. C2-84-994PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Mary and Lyle Bresson sued for injuries resulting from an automobile accident. They appeal the jury’s special verdict awarding no damages. They also challenge the trial court’s admission of medical testimony. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Mary Bresson was involved in a car accident on November 14, 1980. She was taken to the Roseau Hospital emergency room where her left knee was x-rayed. The x-ray showed no injury to the knee.

On November 18, 1980, Bresson was examined by her regular physician, Dr. Allan Janecky. An additional x-ray of the knee showed a small chip fracture of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boland v. MorrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Renne v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Olson v. Havir Manufacturing Co. of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rud v. FloodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. McKay's Family Dodge v. Hardrives, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Hughes v. Sinclair Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Rud v. FloodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State v. ForbordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API