Rud v. Flood
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Olga Rud commenced this action against Raymond Flood to recover damages for injuries sustained as a result of an automobile collision. Flood admitted fault and the sole issue for the jury was the extent of damages sustained by Rud. Rud appeals from the jury’s special verdict finding that she did not sustain a permanent injury. She also challenges the jury’s award of damages. We affirm.
FACTS
While stopped in her car on the shoulder of Crosstown Highway 62 on December 9, 1982, appellant Olga Rud was struck from behind by an automobile driven by respondent Raymond Flood.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Sell v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Wefel Ex Rel. Wefel v. NormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Bresson v. StoskophCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Flanagan v. LindbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Barrera v. MuirCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Boschee v. DuevelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Ruppert v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Flanagan v. LindbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.