Legal Opinion

Bergemann v. Mutual Service Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 28, 1978No. 48085PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

Appeal by third party plaintiffs (hereafter appellants) from an order of the Fillmore County District Court denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, amended findings, or a new trial. A jury found that the third party defendant (hereafter respondent) was negligent, but that the negligence did not cause a fatal intersection collision. The jury found that appellants’ driver was not negligent; it was instructed not to consider the possible negligence of the other driver, the original plaintiff in the action. 1 We reverse and remand for a new trial.

On October 16,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reese v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Zimmerman Ex Rel. Zimmerman v. Witte Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Kuehl v. National Tea Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Bauer v. Kummer Ex Rel. KummerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Rosemount Dodge-Winnebago SouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. GallegosSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hughes v. Sinclair Marketing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Roemer v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Byrns v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API