Legal Opinion
In Re Caesars Palace Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 23, 1973No. 110PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WEINER, District Judge.
The above captioned ease is before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 on the Order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation filed on December 12, 1972 for the purposes of coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings.
The eleven individual cases 1 which constitute this litigation primarily involve alleged violations of Sections 10(b), 13, 14(a), and 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78m, 78n(a), and 78r, Rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and Sections 11, 12, and 17 of the Securities Act…
2Cases cited113 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,803 Steven Flaks v. David I. Koegel and Flora Mir Candy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Huddleston v. Herman & MacLeanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.