Legal Opinion
Herbst v. Able
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 10, 1969No. Nos. 66 Civ. 3216, 3382, 3471, 3775 and 68 Civ. 4141PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Decision on Motions to Declare These Actions Class Actions
MOTLEY, District Judge.
Decision on the motions in four of these five actions to have them declared class actions, pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 23, was reserved by this court in its former opinion of August 26, 1968, 45 F.R.D. 451 pending an evidentiary hearing to be held on December 2, 1968. Since that time the fifth action, Kobre v. Beall, was instituted and plaintiffs in that action also moved to have case declared a class action. A similar hearing was held in that case on January 24, 1969. The purpose of these hearings was to determine…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- John B. Janigan v. Frederick B. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
- Mersay v. First Republic Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Pedro Gonzales v. Clifton W. Cassidy, Jr., John Richard Hayes, Iii, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- In Re Nissan Motor Corporation Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Janicik v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Robertson v. National Basketball AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.