Legal Opinion
Vernon J. Rockler & Co. v. Graphic Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 11, 1971No. 4-70 Civ. 81PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEVILLE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this suit on behalf of themselves and numerous absentee plaintiffs, to recover damages allegedly suffered in connection with the purchase or exchange of capital stock of defendant, Graphic Enterprises, Inc. (Graphic). The suit is based upon alleged violations of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j, and S.E.C. Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. This court has jurisdiction under 15 U.S.C. § 78aa. In essence, plaintiffs complain that defendants employed a device, scheme or artifice to defraud purchasers of Graphic stock, by…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Brisco HUFF, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. N. D. CASS COMPANY OF ALABAMA, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Marceline M. DONALDSON and Others Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. the PILLSBURY COMPANY Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Marshall v. Holiday Magic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Vitiello v. CicconiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- Wolfson v. SolomonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.