Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McGinnis v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1991No. 90-26PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Two issues are presented: (1) Did claimant have an adequate remedy at law via an R.C. 4123.519 appeal? and, if not, (2) May appellant recoup temporary total compensation paid from September 30, 1982 by deducting it from claimant’s future compensation? We answer “no” to both questions.

R.C. 4123.519 provided, at the time relevant herein, in part:

“The claimant or the employer may appeal a decision of the industrial commission * * *, other than a decision as to the extent of disability, to the court of common pleas * * *.” (Emphasis added.)

*82It also directed the claimant to:

“* * * [W]ithin thirty…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Weimer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Zavatsky v. StringerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State ex rel. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State ex rel. O.M. Scott & Sons Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Felty v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Russell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Russell v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. MTD Products, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Dillon v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API