Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Weimer v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1980No. 79-1519PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Per curiam

At no point does appellant dispute the fact that due to clerical error, she was overpaid compensation for her industrial claim. The sole issue is whether recoupment of this overpayment can be made by deducting amounts from future payments.

Continuing jurisdiction is vested in the commission by R. C. 4123.52 which provides, in part:

“The jurisdiction of the industrial commission over each case shall be continuing, and the commission may make such modification or change with respect to former findings or orders with respect thereto, as in its opinion is justified.”

Those cases which have construed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. Ohio Stove Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Nicholls v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State Ex Rel. B & C MacHine Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Nicholls v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Foster v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API