Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. Lancaster

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1988No. Nos. 87-622, 87-1887, 88-205 and 88-1312PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Per curiam

In each of the cases before us, continued payment of temporary total disability compensation was ordered despite a finding that the claimant’s condition had become permanent. The commission concedes that in each case, compensation was continued pursuant to a long-standing commission policy, as contained in a memorandum of October 21, 1987. Specifically, the policy provided that hearing officers, in their discretion, could continue temporary total benefits, despite evidence of permanency, where the claimant had applied for permanent total disability compensation and appeared to meet the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State ex rel. Gilligan v. HoddinottOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Vulcan Materials Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Kelley v. State ex rel. GellnerOhio Supreme Court · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Felty v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Department of Administrative Services v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Nyamusevya v. HawkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API