Legal Opinion

State v. Borah

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1938No. Civil No. 3788PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

James L. Borah,' hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit in the superior court of Maricopa county against the state of Arizona and its Attorney General, and the county attorney of Maricopa county, in their official capacities, hereinafter called defendants, for a declaratory judgment, determining his rights as to certain matters relating to the practice of dentistry. Plaintiff alleged that he was duly admitted to practice dentistry within the state of Arizona upon the recommendation of the Arizona Board of Dental Examiners in the year 1915, and has ever since practiced his profession…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lambert v. YellowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. People v. WitteIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Automatic Registering MacHine Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Hicks v. KrigbaumArizona Supreme Court · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Vest v. CobbWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. City of Phoenix v. YatesArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Edwards v. State Board of Barber ExaminersArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Visco v. State Ex Rel. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1963

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API