Legal Opinion

Automatic Registering MacHine Co. v. Pima County

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1930No. Civil No. 2891PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

On December 4th, 1928, a contract was made between the Automatic Begistering Machine Company, Inc., a corporation, hereinafter called appellant, and Pima county, hereinafter called appellee, acting through its hoard of supervisors, providing for the purchase of some forty voting machines. The purchase price was the sum of $43,420.80, to be paid in eight annual installments of certain amounts. The machines were duly shipped to Tucson by appellant and tendered to appellee; but the board of supervisors in the meantime had changed its membership, and declined to accept the machines, claiming the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lake County v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. United States v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  3. United States v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Fussell v. GreggSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Coggins v. ElyArizona Supreme Court · 1921

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Long v. DickArizona Supreme Court · 1959

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API