Legal Opinion
Visco v. State Ex Rel. Pickrell
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 26, 1963No. 7679PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM W. NABOURS, Superior Court Judge.
This action was brought in the lower court by the Attorney General of the State of Arizona at the request of the Arizona Corporation Commission. The complaint alleged that the appellants Visco, and Arizona Mill Supply, Inc., a corporation, were either operating as a common carrier or contract carrier of property without having first obtained the necessary certificate or permit from the Corporation Commission. It asked that appellants be enjoined from continuing such operations.
The appellants have for many years engaged in the business of scavenging.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Waste Management of Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Mohave Disposal, Inc. v. City of KingmanArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Waste Control Systems, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Arizona Corp. Commission v. Continental Security GuardsArizona Supreme Court · 1968
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.