Legal Opinion

People v. Witte

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1924No. 16253PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeYoung

An amended information was filed in the municipal court of Chicago which charged that Edwin E. Witte on October 24, 1923, treated Anna Nemac for an ailment by a system or method known as naprapathy, without a license to do so. A motion to quash the amended information on the ground that the statute upon which it was based is unconstitutional was denied. A jury trial followed. From the prosecution’s evidence it appeared that Anna Nemac was afflicted with rheumatism; that she called on Witte, who, after interrogating her concerning her ailment, gave her twelve treatments, which consisted solely…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Douglas v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Kettles v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  3. People v. KaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Vest v. CobbWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Richards v. MoorerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  3. People v. United Medical Service, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Potts v. Illinois Department of Registration & EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. The People v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1934

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API