Legal Opinion
Scott v. Farrar
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 1983No. Civ. 65042PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DALSIMER, J.
Plaintiffs, Kimberly Scott and Richard Scott, appeal from the judgment entered following the trial court’s order granting the summary judgment motion of defendant Herbert Saxby Farrar, Sr.
The complaint, which was filed November 21, 1980, alleges that Kimberly was injured on March 19, 1980, at 7:15 a.m. while crossing a street at the intersection of Firestone Boulevard and San Juan Street in South Gate to attend school. The complaint further alleges that Kimberly’s injuries were caused by Farrar’s negligent failure to supply traffic control protection. Richard Scott,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Sprecher v. Adamson CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Tresemer v. BarkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Wall Street Network, Ltd. v. New York Times Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Clarke v. HoekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Slaughter v. Legal Process & Courier ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Kurokawa v. BlumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.