Clarke v. Hoek
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
behalf of a hospital and without compensation, acts as a proctor in observing a surgical operation for the sole and express purpose of assessing and reporting on the competence of a candidate for membership of a hospital medical staff, owes -a duty of care to the patient in the operation w'hich would render the proctor subject to liability for failing to intervene in that surgery in order to prevent malpractice by the proctored surgeon. The question is posed in the context of an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of a physician who served as the proctor on behalf…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Yurick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Lopez v. McDonald's Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Nichols v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- McGettigan v. Bay Area Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Andrews v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.