Legal Opinion

Wall Street Network, Ltd. v. New York Times Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 2008No. B193251PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MANELLA, J.

In the underlying action for breach of contract and misrepresentation by appellant Wall Street Network Ltd. (WSN), the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of respondents New York Times Company (NYT), NETexponent, Chris Kramer, Jason Lerman, and Michael Keenan, and issued an award of attorney fees to respondents. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

There are no material disputes about the following facts: WSN is the assignee of Click2Boost, Inc. (C2B), which entered into an Internet marketing agreement with NYT dated May 10, 2002. Respondent Michael Keenan, who…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Sonic Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. v. AAE Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Food Safety Net Services v. Eco Safe Systems USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. San Mateo Union High School District v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. v. City of Rancho CucamongaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Frittelli, Inc. v. 350 North Canon Drive, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API