Glendora v. Cablevision Systems Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judge:
Glendora Buell, who prefers to be known simply as “Glendora”, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Brieant, J.) dismissing her pro se complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Like many pro se complaints, Glendora’s is verbose where verbosity is unnecessary and sparse where causal allegations are required. However, in view of the well-settled rule, particularly applicable in pro se civil rights actions, that a complaint should not be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gregory Branum v. Clifford Clark, David Hanson, Paul Szarmach, George Stein, and Ross GeogheganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. CrispSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Cable Television Ass'n of New York v. FinneranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Green v. Kadilac Mortgage Bankers, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
- Morrone v. CSC Holdings Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Glendora v. MarshallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- McClellan v. Cablevision of Connecticut, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.