McClellan v. Cablevision of Connecticut, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS
DORSEY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs allege violations of the Cable Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 521 et seq. (“CCA”) (Count I) and Connecticut’s Unfair Trade Practices Act, Conn.Gen.Stat. § 42-110a et seq. (“CUTPA”) (Count II) and seek a preliminary injunction preventing defendants from denying plaintiff Jerry McClellan (“McClellan”) access to defendants’ television studios and from airing his programming. Defendants move to- dismiss, asserting that plaintiffs do not have a private cause of action under 47 U.S.C. § 531(e) and that supplemental jurisdiction over the CUTPA…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McClellan v. Cablevision of Connecticut, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Mcclellan v. Cablevision Of Connecticut, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998