Legal Opinion
Cable Television Ass'n of New York v. Finneran
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 16, 1992No. 384, Docket 91-7539PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Circuit Judge:
This case presents a challenge to New York’s authority to regulate rates charged by cable television companies to customers wishing to downgrade to a less expensive level of cable service. The plaintiff, the Cable Television Association of New York (CTANY), asserts that Congress preempted state authority to regulate downgrade charges in the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. § 521 et seq. [the Cable Act]. The District Court disagreed and granted New York summary judgment. We now affirm.
I
Cable television is a system of wires that carries video programming…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Pdk Labs, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Mitchell K. Friedlander, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Platinum-Montaur Life Sciences, LLC v. Navidea Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Greenwood Trust Company v. Commonwealth of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Time Warner Cable v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Global Discount Travel Services, LLC v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.