Legal Opinion
Weisman v. Kaspar
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 20, 1995No. 15141PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
This appeal requires that we determine whether the trial court properly concluded that the plaintiff, Barbara Weisman, Trustee (BWT), a mortgage lending partnership, acted fraudulently with respect to a certain mortgage transaction with the named defendant, Mary Kaspar. BWT brought an action against Kaspar seeking to foreclose a mortgage that it held on real estate owned by Kaspar in East Hartford. Kaspar subsequently paid the entire amount allegedly due on the mortgage note, and BWT withdrew its complaint. Thereafter, Kaspar filed a three count substitute counterclaim alleging that BWT had…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Billington v. BillingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. DubnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Hartford Whalers Hockey Club v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Providence Electric Co. v. Sutton Place, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Suffield Development Associates Ltd. Partnership v. National Loan Investors, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Citino v. Redevelopment AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Leonard v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- W. v. W.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.