Legal Opinion

Bugryn v. City of Bristol

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 24, 2001No. AC 20511PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOTI, J.

The plaintiffs,1 owners of certain parcels of land in the city of Bristol, appeal from the trial court’s judgments denying their requests for injunctive relief against the defendants.2 The plaintiffs sought to enjoin the defendants from exercising the state’s power of eminent domain to condemn their properties as part of a plan to construct an industrial park. The plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) concluded that the defendants did not violate the plaintiffs’ state and federal constitutional rights, (2) concluded that the defen*100dants did not act in excess of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gohld Realty Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. Pet Car Products, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  3. Powers v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Broadriver, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  5. Town of West Hartford v. TalcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. United Technologies Corp. v. Town of East WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. State v. SpiegelmannConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. Noble v. WhiteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API