Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Puls

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1946No. S. F. 17120PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

This action was brought for declaratory relief, for cancellation of two promissory notes, and for an accounting if a trust were found to exist, or, in the alternative, for a money judgment. Defendant filed a cross-complaint, seeking a money judgment on two book accounts. Plaintiffs’ demand for a jury trial was refused, and after trial by the court without a jury judgment was entered against plaintiffs on their complaint and for defendant on her cross-complaint. Plaintiffs contend on this appeal that the court erred in denying them a jury trial.

The issues raised by the complaint were both…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Connell v. BowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hutchason v. MarksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Radtke v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Crouser v. BoiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. People v. Metropolitan Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Grafton Partners L.P. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Alcoa Global Fasteners, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API