Legal Opinion

Radtke v. Taylor

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1922PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

The plaintiff has been engaged in the general merchandise business in Athena since about 1910. Prior to March, 1918, the store was owned and conducted by Albert Fix and the plaintiff as partners under the firm name of Fix & Radtke, but upon that date the plaintiff acquired the interest of his partner in the store as well as the outstanding accounts, including the alleged account against Taylor. The plaintiff has acted as manager of the store during the time he has been “operating this store,” and one of his duties has been to collect the accounts. The plaintiff testified that he kept the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. In the Matter of McGoldrick v. . TraphagenNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Zang v. WyantSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  3. State v. StephensonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. House v. BeakIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Sickles v. MatherNew York Supreme Court · 1838

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. E. I. duPont deNemours & Co. v. Universal Moulded Products Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  2. Robinson v. PulsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Sullivan v. CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  5. Sather v. GiaconiOregon Supreme Court · 1923

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API