Legal Opinion

People v. Metropolitan Surety Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1912No. S.F. No. 5553PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against the corporation defendant for $18,732.85, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The above-mentioned sum was the amount of an alleged shortage in the accounts of George A. Wiley, as treasurer of Contra Costa County, and the action was brought to recover this sum from the corporation defendant, as surety on Wiley’s official bond.

Wiley was elected county treasurer in November, 1902, to serve for a term beginning January 5, 1903, and ending on January 7, 1907. He duly qualified, giving a bond in the penal sum…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  2. Bruce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  3. Swasey v. AdairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Adams v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Exline v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Grafton Partners L.P. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Parker v. James Granger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. State v. PavelichWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Robinson v. PulsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API