Legal Opinion

People v. Martinez

California Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 2000No. S062266PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

In this case, we consider whether uncertified computer printouts reporting criminal history information are admissible as evidence that a *112defendant alleged to be a habitual offender (Pen. Code, § 667.7)1 served prison terms for prior felony convictions. The Court of Appeal held that the trial court did not err in admitting the printouts under the official records exception to the hearsay rule (Evid. Code, § 1280). On the record of this case, we agree, and therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

Facts

On July 16, 1994, defendant choked and raped an eight-year-old…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. United States v. Gjon N. Nivica, United States of America v. Mark L. Pedley, A/K/A Jack Williams, Mark WellingtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. AlexanderCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. People v. DeHoyosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. People v. GoldsmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API