Legal Opinion

Stanford v. Bailey Incorporated

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1955No. Civ. 20664PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from an adverse judgment entered on a jury verdict in an action for damages for personal injuries.

Defendant Lyon was the owner and lessor of a building in Pasadena. Defendant Bailey was the lessee of the building and operated a café or restaurant therein. The entrance doorway to the café was set back 43 inches from the sidewalk paralleling the front of the building. A concrete ramp extended from the sidewalk to the entrance door. The ramp was constructed of nonroughened concrete and had no nonslip material on it. The ramp was in a recess, i. e., there were walls…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Klein v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. Tevis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Landgraf v. KuhIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Neuber v. Royal Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Swanberg v. O'MECTINCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Hanna v. LedermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Nourafchan v. MinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Hall v. MertzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Sorensen v. Western Hotels, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API