Legal Opinion
Neuber v. Royal Realty Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 7, 1948No. Civ. 15971PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered against her on a verdict of the jury rendered in favor of the defendants pursuant to direction of the court.
Epitomizing the facts as they appear in the record, it appears that defendant Royal Realty Company is a California corporation (hereinafter referred to as “the company”), and at all times here pertinent, was the owner of certain property at the corner of Wilshire Boulevard and Alvarado Street, in the city of Los Angeles, improved with a ‘1 Class C ’ ’ building.
Defendant Herman Helbush is and at all times herein pertinent was president of the…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Puckhaber v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Shanley v. American Olive Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Mautino v. Sutter Hospital Assn.California Supreme Court · 1931
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
- Snyder v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Atherley v. MacDonald, Young & Nelson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Porter v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.