Legal Opinion
Hanna v. Lederman
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 1963No. Civ. 26720PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
The plaintiffs, tenants of a building owned by the defendants, have appealed from a judgment for the defendants in an action to recover for damages to personal property caused by water. The building was located at 1024 Santee Street in the City of Los Angeles. A fire which originated in a refrigerator on the seventh floor caused three heads of the fire sprinkler system to open. The water ran for a substantial period of time and flooded the building before it was shut off early on the morning of January 29, 1954. The system was not equipped with a device which would sound an alarm as soon as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
- Harris v. JoffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- H. S. Mann Corp. v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Evola v. Wendt Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Goldman v. Ecco-Phoenix Electric Corp.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Agricultural Services Association, Incorporated v. Ferry-Morse Seed Company, Incorporated, and Waldo Rohnert Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- United Business Commission v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- S. A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense (Varig Airlines), Plaintiff v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Health Net of California, Inc. v. Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.