Legal Opinion
Hall v. Mertz
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 4, 1971No. 2 CA-CIV 874PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Judge.
The plaintiff, a nine year old girl at the time of the accident, was injured when her bicycle collided with a car at a “blind intersection” in a residential district of Tucson, Arizona.
Plaintiff brought an action for damages against the City of Tucson, the driver of the automobile, and the owner of the property on which the obstruction was located.
The case was' tried to the court. After •the plaintiff rested, the court granted the owner’s motion for involuntary dismissal, ■dismissing the action which the plaintiff Tad asserted against the property owner. Pursuant to Rule 41(b),…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
- Osborne v. McMastersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Collier v. StamatisArizona Supreme Court · 1945
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Coburn v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Whitt v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Evans v. Southern Holding Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Slavin v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Hatch Development, LLC v. SolomonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.