Legal Opinion

Sorensen v. Western Hotels, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1960No. 34982PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The determinative issue here is whether a building code was retroactive, so as to make conditions in existing buildings unlawful which had theretofore been lawful.

The plaintiff, Byron M. Sorensen who had been a guest in the Leopold hotel at Bellingham for about six weeks, slipped while descending a ramp which connected an alley entrance to the hotel with the lobby. He brought an action against the Leopold Hotel Company. A jury awarded him substantial damages, and a judgment was entered on the verdict.

From that judgment the defendant, which we will hereafter refer to as the hotel, appeals and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Franks v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. North Chicago Electric Railway Co. v. PeuserIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Wallner v. Chicago Consolidated Traction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Great Northern Railway Co. v. CohnWashington Supreme Court · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  2. State v. LadigesWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Gilmore v. HershawWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Teague v. DamascusDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1960
  5. Knutson v. BarbourMontana Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API