Legal Opinion

Kelson v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1976No. L.A. 30478PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of California that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for one year. Petitioner, who was admitted to practice in January 1966, has no prior record of discipline.

In a notice to show cause, petitioner was charged with attempting to solicit professional employment from Euolah Lopez, personally, as well as through the use of lay intermediaries. The local administrative committee unanimously found that petitioner’s actions constituted a knowing and willful violation of rules 2…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Segretti v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Zitny v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Toll v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Tomlinson v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tardiff v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Franklin v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Chasteen v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Matter of SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Sexton v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API