Legal Opinion

Franklin v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1986No. L.A. 32094PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

41 Cal.3d 700 (1986)

715 P.2d 699

224 Cal. Rptr. 738

FLOYD FRANKLIN, Petitioner,

v.

THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

Docket No. L.A. 32094.

Supreme Court of California.

April 7, 1986.

COUNSEL

Edgar L. Borne III for Petitioner.

Herbert M. Rosenthal and Truitt A. Richey, Jr., for Respondent.

OPINION

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review the findings and recommendations of the State Bar concerning petitioner, Floyd Franklin.

The hearing panel recommended that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for five years, that execution of the suspension be stayed, and that he be placed on…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Chefsky v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Alberton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In Re BogartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. In Re JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Guzzetta v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re ChiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Coppock v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Mepham v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In Re YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API