Legal Opinion
Tardiff v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
Decided July 3, 1980No. L.A. 31207PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is a proceeding to review the recommendation of the State Bar Court that petitioner David Tardiff be reinstated to the practice of law subject to a two-year probationary period with stipulated conditions pertaining to the handling of clients’ funds. We conclude that petitioner should not be reinstated.
The two-member hearing panel in this proceeding filed a proposed decision recommending the unqualified reinstatement of petitioner. The examiner for the State Bar filed a statement in opposition to the pro*398posed decision and sought advisory review of it. The examiner claimed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Feinstein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Roth v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Preston v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- In Re GaffneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Resner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. McCorkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re: BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- Kennick v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Goff v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Hippard v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.