Sexton v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Darrell Hickman, Justice.
Sam Sexton, Jr., a Fort Smith lawyer, had his law license suspended for one year by the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct. We must reverse the decision because Sexton was not charged with a violation of a rule of professional conduct that was in existence at the time of his conduct. The committee may proceed against Sexton if he is properly charged.
The charge arose from conduct which occurred in 1983. According to the findings of the committee, when Sexton settled a claim for Danny Haffelder, who was injured in a motorcycle accident, Sexton suggested…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KerpelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, Etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Montgomery County Bar Ass'n v. HechtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Matter of Arkansas Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Kelson v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by12 opinions
- Neal v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Sexton v. Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Sexton v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- In Re IlluzziSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Ligon v. ReesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.