Legal Opinion
Jesse Lee Howell v. United States of America, Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff-Third Party v. Daniel L. Nichols and Sydney Nichols, Third Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 3, 1996No. 95-5093PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
81 F.3d 172
77 A.F.T.R.2d 96-1796, 96-1 USTC P 50,193,
Unempl.Ins.Rep. (CCH) P 15214B
NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.
Jesse Lee HOWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Counterclaim
Plaintiff-Third Party…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Darlene Thomas v. International Business MacHines a New York Corporation Doing Business in the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Steamship Clerks Union, Local 1066Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Wilson v. MeeksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kane v. Capital Guardian Trust Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Amoco Production Co. v. Hugoton Energy Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Urban ex rel. Urban v. KingDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998