Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Meeks
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 20, 1995No. Nos. 94-3179, 94-3180PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, including the estate of Datton Wilson, Jr., and members of his family, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and pen-' dent state law asserting that members of the Haysville Police Department violated Mr. Wilson’s constitutional rights by using excessive force, failing to render emergency medical treatment, and participating in a coverup. Defendants moved for- summary judgment based on qualified immunity. The district court granted the motion in part and denied it in part, stating there were disputed facts on the issue of qualified immunity to be…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Barney v. PulsipherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Medina v. CramCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Holland Ex Rel. Overdorff v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Garrett v. StratmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Olsen v. Layton Hills MallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.