Legal Opinion

Amoco Production Co. v. Hugoton Energy Corp.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 25, 1998No. Civil Action 95-1474-MLBPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIVIL ACTION

BELOT, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment (Docs. 86 & 88). The parties have filed several other documents in support or opposition (Docs. 87, 89, 92, 96, 97 & 98). For the reasons stated below, the court grants Hugoton Energy Corporation’s motion (Doc. 88) and denies Amoco Production Company’s motion (Doe. 86).

I. NATURE OF THE CASE

This diversity action arises from the alleged breach of a contract created to promote oil exploration on land leased by Amoco. The court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a).

II. STANDARDS FOR…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Belinda MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NANNIE AND THE NEWBORNS, INC.; Business Solutions, Inc.; Larry D. Gudgel, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. Muck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Comeau v. RuppDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weatherby v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  2. Antonetti v. FilsonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API