Amoco Production Co. v. Hugoton Energy Corp.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
CIVIL ACTION
BELOT, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment (Docs. 86 & 88). The parties have filed several other documents in support or opposition (Docs. 87, 89, 92, 96, 97 & 98). For the reasons stated below, the court grants Hugoton Energy Corporation’s motion (Doc. 88) and denies Amoco Production Company’s motion (Doe. 86).
I. NATURE OF THE CASE
This diversity action arises from the alleged breach of a contract created to promote oil exploration on land leased by Amoco. The court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a).
II. STANDARDS FOR…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Belinda MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NANNIE AND THE NEWBORNS, INC.; Business Solutions, Inc.; Larry D. Gudgel, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Muck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Comeau v. RuppDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weatherby v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Antonetti v. FilsonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020