Legal Opinion
Urban ex rel. Urban v. King
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 12, 1998No. CIV.A. 95-1438-MLBPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BELOT, District Judge.
Before the court is Defendant Carolyn Ann Wilson’s motion for summary judgment (Doe. 30). The parties have filed several other documents in support or opposition (Does. 31, 42 & 45). For the reasons stated below, the court denies the motion.
I. NATURE OF THE CASE
This diversity action is a medical malpractice case relating to prenatal care provided by defendants to Rosalind Marie Urban on November 24, 1989. The court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a).
II. STANDARDS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c) directs the entry of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Belinda MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NANNIE AND THE NEWBORNS, INC.; Business Solutions, Inc.; Larry D. Gudgel, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Muck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- FWB Bank v. RichmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999