Provo City v. Whatcott
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACKSON, Associate Presiding Judge:
¶ 1 Scott A. Whatcott challenges his conviction for telephone harassment, a Class B misdemeanor in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-9-201 (1999). Because subsections (a) and (d) of the telephone harassment statute are unconstitutionally overbroad, we reverse Whatcott’s conviction.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 “When reviewing a jury verdict, we examine the evidence and all reasonable inferences in a light most favorable to the verdict, reciting the facts accordingly. We present conflicting evidence only when necessary to understand issues raised on appeal.” State v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bolles v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- State v. MohiUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. LopesUtah Supreme Court · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Provo City Corp. v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Lehi City v. RickabaughCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- Provo City v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
- Whatcott v. City of ProvoDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2005
- Randall v. Change.org, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020