Legal Opinion

Provo City v. Whatcott

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 23, 2000No. 981642-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACKSON, Associate Presiding Judge:

¶ 1 Scott A. Whatcott challenges his conviction for telephone harassment, a Class B misdemeanor in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-9-201 (1999). Because subsections (a) and (d) of the telephone harassment statute are unconstitutionally overbroad, we reverse Whatcott’s conviction.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 “When reviewing a jury verdict, we examine the evidence and all reasonable inferences in a light most favorable to the verdict, reciting the facts accordingly. We present conflicting evidence only when necessary to understand issues raised on appeal.” State v.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Bolles v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  4. State v. MohiUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. LopesUtah Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Provo City Corp. v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Lehi City v. RickabaughCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  3. Provo City v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  4. Whatcott v. City of ProvoDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2005
  5. Randall v. Change.org, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API