Legal Opinion

Provo City Corp. v. Thompson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 2004No. 20020307PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

BACKGROUND

¶ 1 Defendant Sean S. Thompson was convicted under Utah Code section 76-9-201 for making repeated calls to his ex-wife, Carolyn, after she previously told him not to call back. The trial court found that the defendant telephoned Carolyn late at night eleven times within a one-hour time period. Carolyn told the defendant not to call several times that night, but the defendant continued his calls. As a result, Carolyn finally called the Provo City Police Department, and Officer Michael Bastían was dispatched to Carolyn’s house. While Officer Bastían was at her…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Savage v. Utah Youth VillageUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Goebel v. Salt Lake City Southern RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API