Provo City v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORME, Judge.
T1 Defendant Sean G. Thompson appeals from a bench trial conviction of telephone harassment, a class B misdemeanor, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-9-201 (1999), as adopted by Provo City. Defendant argues that section 76-9-201 is both unconstitutionally overbroad and unconstitutionally vague. He also argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We conclude that portions of section 76-9-201 are indeed facially overbroad. However, we affirm defendant's conviction because we conclude that the portion of subsection 76-9-201(1)(b) most applicable to defendant's…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Provo City Corp. v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Lehi City v. RickabaughCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- American Fork City v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011