Legal Opinion

Whatcott v. City of Provo

District Court, D. Utah

Decided February 3, 2005No. 2:01 CV 490PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

BENSON, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Compel Discovery. Having considered the parties’ briefs and the applicable law, the Court issues the following Memorandum Opinion and Order.

I. Background

In 1999, Plaintiff Scott Whatcott was prosecuted by defendant for violating Provo City’s Telephone Harassment Ordinance. Provo City Revised Ordinance § 9/76-9-201. Plaintiff was convicted by a jury of violating the ordinance and was sentenced to serve ten days in jail.1

*629Plaintiff appealed his conviction to the Utah Court of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kenneth Ray Meade v. Grubbs, Badge No. 128, Individually and as a Deputy Sheriff of the County of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. Ehrenhaus v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. Creative Gifts, Inc. v. UFOCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. Waters v. McGurimanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Logan City v. HuberCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cloward v. RaceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024
  2. Parent 1 Mother v. Park City School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API