Legal Opinion
Glover, M., Aplt. v. Udren Law Offices
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 20, 2016No. 3 WAP 2015, 4 WAP 2015PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Chief Justice SAYLOR.1
In these consolidated appeals, the Court is asked to determine whether a law firm, representing a residential mortgage lender in connection with foreclosure proceedings, can be liable to a borrower for attorney’s fees charged in violation of the Pennsylvania Loan Interest and Protection Law.
The Loan Interest and Protection Law,2 in relevant part, limits the attorney’s fees that a “residential mortgage lender shall contract for or receive ... from a residential mortgage debtor.” 41 P.S. § 406. As a remedy for a violation of Act 6’s protective provisions, Section…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- J. E. M. Ag Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Glover v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Villani v. Seibert Appeal of: SeibertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Taggart, K., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- In re SellersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Johnson v. Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg, LLPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Almashhadani v. NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN, P.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.