POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy
POM Wonderful LLC makes and sells pomegranate juice products, including a pomegranate-blueberry juice blend. App. 23a. One of POM's competitors is the Coca-Cola Company. Coca-Cola's Minute Maid Division makes a juice blend sold with a label that, in describing the contents, displays the words "pomegranate blueberry" with far more prominence than other words on the label that show the juice to be a blend of five juices. In truth, the Coca-Cola product contains but 0.3% pomegranate juice and 0.2% blueberry juice.
Alleging that the use of that label is deceptive and misleading, POM sued Coca-Cola…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- Bryana Bible v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Linda Suchanek v. Sturm Foods, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- In re Anheuser-Busch Beer Labeling Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. David Williams, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Angelo Binno v. The American Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.