Legal Opinion

JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Taggart, K., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 2019No. 6 EAP 2018PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wecht

*188 Kenneth J. Taggart ("Taggart") appeals from the order of the Superior Court, which affirmed the trial court's verdict in mortgage foreclosure in favor of Great Ajax Operating Partnership ("Great Ajax"). We conclude that Great Ajax or its predecessors failed to provide pre-foreclosure notice before initiating a second mortgage foreclosure action as required by the Loan Interest and Protection Law, 41 P.S. §§ 101 - 605 ("Act 6"). In reaching this conclusion, we hold that the purposes of Act 6 are served by requiring each action in mortgage foreclosure to be preceded by a separate…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. A.S. v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Roethlein v. Portnoff Law Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. U.S. Bank v. Davis, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. U.S. Bank v. Davis, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. BUTKO v. CICCOZZIDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Bartkowski, T. v. Ramondo, K., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. C. Cunningham v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2025

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API