Legal Opinion

Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 2010No. 67 MAP 2008PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

A provision of the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act of 1968 (the “Act”) 1 exempts from the statute’s minimum wage and overtime requirements employment for “[d]omestic services in or about the private home of the employer.” 43 P.S. § 333.105(a)(2). A regulation promulgated by Appellee, Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry (the “Department”), defines “domestic services” as “[w]ork in or about a private dwelling for an employer in his capacity as a householder, as distinguished from work in or about a private dwelling for such employer in the employer’s pursuit of a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Kariher's Petition (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Insurance Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Werner v. ZazycznySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Bruno, D., Aplts. v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Rushing, R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Governor's Office v. Office of Open Records, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Brewington, S. v. Phila. Sch. Dist., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API